martin kaymer allison micheletti dating - Flaws in radiometric dating
Also remember that modern disasters (on a smaller scale) like Mount St.
All the canyon layers are ocean bottom sediments, filled with fossils of ocean-dwelling creatures and plants almost a mile high from top to bottom.
The Cardenas Basalt bottom layer (below the Cambrian explosion) is usually dated with Rhobidium -Strontium and calculated to be about 1 billion years old.
How can the very top, volcanic rock be older than the very bottom layer basalt rock?
Even evolutionists admit that those Indian artifacts are not 1.3 billion years old!
In geology, the buzzword is “The present is the key to the past” – but today – no 100 mile cavern systems are being formed, vitually no fossils are being formed, and no new strata covering entire continents are being laid down. Unfortunately, uniformitarianism has gripped geology academia and no other viewpoints are allowed.
What we see around the earth are huge layers of sedimentary rock filled with dead things. This evolutionary assumption has become a naturalistic religion, an ideology established already before Darwin published his book in 1859.
That concept began with eighteenth-century French naturalist Georges Cuvier, picked up steam with Charles Lyell, and it has been in vogue ever since.
This is despite the fact that it causes more problems for interpreting rock strata than it solves.
To assume the rock starts with only U and no Pb is a big assumption.
(Isochron dating, which relies on multiple rock samples, is an attempt to correct this, but still has underlying assumptions based on 1 and 2 above.) Examples of Problems with Radiometric dating of rocks: Grand Canyon Lava flows: Sedimentary rocks make up the layers of the Grand Canyon and these are not dateable by radiometric dating.
A Summary of the Million Dollar RATE Research Project (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) Introduction: Rocks and fossils do not come with dates on them.